CryptoServers
Buyer guide · 9 min read

VPS vs dedicated bare-metal: when to switch

Most workloads start on a VPS. Some outgrow it. The question is rarely "VPS or dedicated?" in the abstract — it's "at what concurrency, dataset size, or noisy-neighbour tolerance does our load justify a dedicated host?" This guide answers that with thresholds we see in production, not vendor-supplied benchmarks.

No KYC, ever DMCA ignored No traffic logs Live in 60 seconds

The honest one-liner

If you can plot a hockey-stick on your CPU steal time, you've already outgrown the VPS. Steal above 5% sustained means a neighbour is winning the scheduler — your latency P99 will reflect it long before your average load looks bad.

Below that, a VPS is almost always the right call. KVM with NVMe-local storage and AES-NI on a modern EPYC core gets you within 3–8% of bare-metal for typical web, VPN, mail, IRC and Lightning workloads. The 92–97% you keep is well worth the pricing delta and the live-resize ergonomics.

When the VPS still fits — clearly

Personal egress (your own WireGuard or OpenVPN endpoint), a Tor relay below 25 MB/s sustained, a single-user mail server, a Bitcoin pruned node, a Monero remote node serving fewer than a few hundred wallets, a Matrix homeserver for a small community, a private game server, a personal seedbox below 240 GB of working set — all of these run comfortably on a VPS and gain very little from going bare-metal.

Why: their bottleneck is rarely raw CPU. It's network reach, IP reputation, jurisdictional posture, and whether the host throttles port 25 or shapes p2p traffic. A VPS that gives you full root, raw sockets, unmetered uplink and editable rDNS is functionally identical to bare-metal for these loads.

The four signals a workload has outgrown the VPS

Sustained CPU steal above 5%. Run `vmstat 1` for a peak hour. If `st` regularly sits above 5, you're sharing a core with someone hot. We re-host neighbours when steal climbs, but a dedicated host removes the variable entirely.

Working set exceeds 24 GB and is latency-sensitive. RAM contention on KVM is rare on our hosts (we don't oversell memory), but a dataset the size of a Bitcoin txindex (~120 GB on disk, hot pages 10–30 GB) starts to hit ARC eviction patterns where 64 GB ECC headroom changes behaviour. Lightning routing nodes, Matrix Synapse with 200+ federated rooms, and Postgres-heavy CI databases all hit this earlier than people expect.

Disk write bandwidth above 400 MB/s sustained. Single Gen4 NVMe handles this on a VPS. Two Gen4 NVMe in mirror on a dedicated tier handles it without the GC pauses that come with shared NVMe namespaces.

Network egress above 5 Gbps sustained. We sell VPS plans with 10 Gbps unmetered, and they really do hit 10 Gbps for short bursts — but a sustained 5+ Gbps for hours on end is more comfortable on dedicated hardware where the NIC is yours alone.

Where dedicated wins outright

Bitcoin Core or Ethereum archive nodes you intend to operate for years without re-IBD'ing. The 36-hour IBD on a single-socket EPYC with 2× Gen4 NVMe in software RAID is night-and-day faster than the 3–4 day IBD on a Business-tier VPS, and once it's done, the disk reliability matters more than the throughput.

Lightning routing hubs targeting 1000+ channels and large capacity. HTLC throughput is CPU-bound under load, and dedicated cores eliminate the steal-time tail that occasionally causes channel-state staleness.

Public Matrix homeservers with thousands of federated rooms. Postgres on its own NVMe + Synapse workers on the other NVMe + Redis on a third namespace = three I/O lanes with zero contention.

Self-hosted CI with build farms running Docker-in-Docker, sysbox, or Firecracker microVMs at scale. Nested virtualisation works on KVM, but bare-metal eliminates the second-layer paravirt overhead.

BGP-announced /29 or /48 with your own AS-path. We provision BGP sessions on dedicated tiers from Bastion up; on VPS plans, you share our prefixes.

The pricing arithmetic

A vps-pro at $54.99/month gives you 8 vCPU on Xeon Gold 6430, 24 GB DDR5 ECC, 400 GB NVMe, 5 Gbps unmetered. A ded-shield at $79/month gives you 16 cores / 32 threads of EPYC 7313P, 64 GB DDR4 ECC, 2× 1 TB NVMe, 1 Gbps unmetered. The dedicated tier costs $24/month more for roughly 2× the CPU, 2.7× the RAM, 5× the disk, with mirrored storage.

If your workload is CPU-, RAM-, or storage-bound, the bump pays for itself the day you provision. If it's network-bound at 5+ Gbps, the VPS keeps winning until you size up to a Bastion or higher with 10 Gbps included.

Crypto-billed monthly with no minimums means you can run dedicated for one month while you're stress-testing, then drop back to VPS if the load profile turns out to be lighter than feared. There's no annual commitment that locks you in.

Migration playbook

Rsync + cutover window: provision the dedicated host in the same jurisdiction, rsync your dataset over the local network (we have 10+ Gbps internal between hosts in the same DC), set up a maintenance page on the VPS, do a final sync, swap DNS or IP failover. Total downtime: typically 2–10 minutes for a few-hundred-gig dataset.

If your IP matters (Lightning channels, federated Matrix homeserver, mail rDNS), we can move the /29 across hosts in the same DC without re-IPing — open a panel ticket and we do it in 24 hours during a quiet window.

If you can't afford any downtime: split-brain for a day. Keep both hosts live, change the application to write to both, fail reads to the dedicated, then cut writes once the dedicated is authoritative. This is the shape of every database migration we've watched customers run successfully.

Quick answers

Frequently asked

How do I tell if I have a noisy neighbour problem?
Run vmstat 1 60 for a peak hour and watch the st column. Anything sustained above 5% is bad; spikes to 10–15% during peaks are tolerable but suggest a re-host is overdue. Open a panel ticket with the output and we'll schedule a live migration to a quieter host within 24 hours — no charge.
Can I downgrade from dedicated back to VPS later?
Yes — there's no contract or lock-in. Provision the VPS, rsync your dataset across, cut over, and we destroy the dedicated host. You'll get a pro-rated refund for the unused portion of the month back as crypto. We do this surprisingly often — people stress-test on dedicated, find their actual load is lighter, and right-size back to a Pro or Scale tier.
Do you do hot-resize on dedicated, or only on VPS?
Hot-resize works for vCPU and RAM on every VPS plan — disk needs one reboot. Dedicated tiers don't hot-resize the hardware (the cores and DIMMs are physical), but you can stack a second dedicated host alongside and load-balance at the application layer. We've done that for game-server clusters and CI build farms; the L4 scrubbing fabric handles the inbound DNAT cleanly.
Is one dedicated really equivalent to several VPSes?
For CPU-bound work, yes — a 16-core EPYC 7313P typically out-throughputs three 6 vCPU VPS instances under the same workload, mostly because hypervisor overhead and steal-time vanish. For I/O-bound work, the gap is even larger because you stop sharing NVMe namespaces. For pure network-egress workloads (VPNs, seedboxes), the per-vCPU pricing of VPS is hard to beat until you saturate the network.
What about latency — does dedicated reduce P99?
Materially, yes. Median latency is similar (within 1–2 ms for in-network requests), but P99 tightens dramatically when you remove neighbour interference. We see P99 drops from ~80 ms down to ~25 ms on the same workload moving from a busy VPS host to a dedicated. If your SLOs are tail-latency-driven, that's the single biggest reason to switch.
Apply this

Workloads this guide applies to

Each card opens a workload-specific page with sizing recommendations and a sysadmin FAQ.

Read enough? Deploy in 60 seconds

No email verification, no ID, no account. Pick a plan, pay in any cryptocurrency, get root.